Technology

Difference between Raid 5 and Raid 10

Main difference

RAID (Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks) is a data storage arrangement that authorizes a system administrator / designer / builder / user to associate two or more physical storage devices (HDD, SSD, or both) into one logical unit (a array) which is seen by the friendly system as a single disk. As the best and most common “full” RAID level, RAID 5 spreads data blocks across all drives in an array (at least 3 to a maximum of 32) and also spreads parity data across all drives (Figure 5). In the event of a single drive catastrophe, the system reads parity data from the working drives to reconstruct lost data blocks.RAID 10 (sometimes referred to as RAID 10) combines RAID 1 and RAID 10 to provide various sets of mirrors grouped together.

What is Raid 5?

RAID 5 consists of block-level striping with distributed parity. RAID 5 requires at least three disks. RAID 5 is seriously affected by general trends regarding array rebuild time and drive failure coincidence during rebuild.

What is Raid 10?

Raid 10 requires a minimum of 4 disks, excellent redundancy, and excellent performance.

Key differences

  1. RAID 5’s performance in read procedures is quite appreciated, although its write operation is quite slow, compared to RAID 10. Therefore, RAID 10 is used for organizations that require high write performance. So it is very obvious that RAID 10 is not used for systems like heavy databases, which require high-speed write performance.
  2. RAID 10 arrays have more data terminations than RAID 5 arrays. This makes RAID 10 an ideal choice for cases where high data redundancy is required.
  3. RAID 10 provides more architectural flexibility, compared to RAID 5. The amount of free space remaining is also reduced, if you use a RAID 10 data storage scheme.
  4. RAID 5 requires a high-end card for data storage performance. If the operating system is working out the purpose of the RAID 5 controller, then it will slow down the display of the computer. In the case of a RAID 10 controller, any hardware controller can be used.
  5. RAID 10 finds a wide variety of applications. Systems with RAID 0, RAID 1, or RAID 5 storage arrays are often replaced with a RAID 10 storage scheme. They are primarily used for medium-sized databases. RAID 5 disks are mainly used in procedures that require transactions. Relational databases are among the other fields that work very well under a RAID 5 storage scheme.
  6. RAID 5 has been used for many critical applications such as SQL server machine. However, RAID 10 appears to be much more robust considering the hardware.
  7. Raid 10 can have significant performance gains over Raid 5 (especially on random or small writes), but storage capacity is halved.
  8. Raid 5 has the best storage efficiency and high sequential read performance compared to Raid 10.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

CAPTCHA


Back to top button