Amidst” is just a slightly older (and mostly British) variant of “amid”. The meaning is the same for both. It is practically the same as between . Two meanings:» surrounded by «,» in the middle of «,» in an atmosphere of «,» in a context of «. Often, “in-between” and “in-between” are confused with “between” or “between”. While these words have a very similar meaning and both have the same ending, there is a subtle difference that needs to be noted. The difference is that “among” or “between” has the meaning of being intermingled with distinct or separate objects. The words are very similar, and apparently English speakers use them interchangeably. While some English speakers seem to prefer one version of the word over the other, some use both.
What is Amid?
The general definition of amid is “in the midst of; Come in “
What is in between?
The general definition of in between is “in the middle of; surrounded; between, in or during the course of; during.
- The difference between en medio y en medio (or between between and between) is stylistic.
- Compared to Amid, Amidst is considered, in American usage, to be a bit archaic and pretentious. American students are taught, when faced with a choice between two words, to use the shortest and simplest word. However, the longest word is sometimes the best option in terms of style.
- The difference between medium and medium actually exists in preference and use. This is simple because in the middle and in the middle means exactly the same thing.
- The word in the middle is normally used in the sense of ‘in the middle of’ or ‘surrounded by’. So, it’s the word in the middle.
- In the middle and in the middle are used as prepositions.
- British English uses both amid and en medio. American English prefers middle to middle.
- Both words have the same meaning, it’s just the difference in British or American style.
- Mainly in the middle and in the middle, Amidst is mainly used in grammar as a replacement for Amongst.