Difference Between DEB and RPM

From the point of view of the individual, there may not be many in these devices. The RPM and DEB codecs are simply file data records, with some metadata related to them. They are equally arcane, have encrypted distribution routes, and differ only in fine detail. DEB registry data is organized for Debian-based distributions. RPM log data is organized log data for Red Hat-based distributions. Ubuntu depends on the Debian package based on APT and DPKG. Red Hat, CentOS, and Fedora are all based on the old Red Hat Linux package management system, RPM.

What is DEB?

DEB is the Debian software package format extension and is most likely the most widely used title for such binary packages. DEB was developed by Bedian

What is RPM?

It is a package management system. The RPM title again refers to the .rpm file format, the log data in this format, the software program packaged in that log data, and the package monitor itself. RPM was primarily intended for Linux distributions; the file format is the Linux Standard Base package format. RPM was developed by Community and Red Hat.

Key differences

1. DEB registry data is organized for Debian-based distributions. RPM log data is organized log data for Red Hat-based distributions. There are different types for various distributions. Each one is just completely different from the alternative. All are designed to make organizing packages less of a hassle across numerous distributions. None are executable data records. DEB log data is used with dpkg, aptitude, apt-get. The rpm register data is used with yum.
2. Ubuntu depends on the Debian package based on APT and DPKG. Red Hat, CentOS, and Fedora are all based on the old Red Hat Linux package management system, RPM.
3. Each RPM has a ‘spec’ file, detailing which model of the application it will be put into and what smaller capacities should be put in to make sure it works. The DEB file also relies on an ‘administration file’ which might be much like an RPM package’s ‘specs’ file, as it defines which software program to install to ensure its target utility will run, provides a description of what you will organize.
4. For a long time, apt-get has been superior at processing a lot of metadata really fast, whereas yum would take ages to do it. Also, RPM suffered from websites like RPM discovering the place where you would find 10+ incompatible packages for various distributions. Apt completely hid this drawback for DEB packages because all purchased packages come from an identical vendor.
5. DEB was developed by Bedian, RPM was developed by Community and Red Hat.
6. In the Debian world, it is a bit more accepted to carry patches in a package that is (however) not upstream. In the world of RPM (at least among the many Red Hat derivatives) that is frowned upon.
7. Debian has an infinite number of scripts that could be ready to automate an infinite portion of a package build. Sometimes making a – simple – package of a Python program with setuptool’ed is as simple as creating a series of metadata records and working on debuild. We talked about that, the spec file for such a package in RPM format could be quite fast, and within the RPM world, there are also several things that are automated these days.